Review: The Comeback
By: Christine Smith
(McFarlane)
The Comeback is a timely book in the sense that it is written at a time in which the political landscape of Canada is changing in both the non-Aboriginal world and the Aboriginal world.
John Ralston Saul
delves into many theories and explanations of why Canada is shaped the way that
it is in his new book The Comeback. He also calls upon all Canadians to rebuild
their relationship with Aboriginal people because it is the centrality of
Aboriginal issues and peoples that has the potential to open up a more creative
way of imagining ourselves and a more honest narrative for Canada.
In The Comeback, he
writes “for the last hundred years Aboriginal peoples have been making a
comeback- a remarkable comeback from a terrifyingly low point of population, of
legal respect, of civilizational stability, a comeback to a position of power,
influence and civilizational creativity” but I beg to differ on this statement
and find it to be misleading.
I find it to be
misleading because as a First Nations woman, I believe that the current state
of affairs in Canada is not about a comeback. First Nations people have always
been present and we have always had our rights and have known where they come
from. Furthermore, a comeback from a terrifyingly low population is not a
result of our own actions, but a result of the dominant takeover of European
peoples-colonization.
Our ways of life, our
economic well being, social well- being and food sources were jeopardized. European
diseases that were brought through contact were particularly destructive and
Aboriginal peoples lives were lost. I have always understood that there is a
deep contradiction in the reality and the mythology of Canadian life. Saul
backs this up by stating “it was in the forty years before the European civil
war began that Canadians of European origin decided that “Indians,”
“Half-breeds” and “Esquimaux” were among the destined losers when faced by our
superiority-our Darwinian destiny.”
Our Canadian history
can also be viewed through a racialized lens. Saul writes “The structures
within which Aboriginals must work have been artificially put in place by
governments, largely by London and Ottawa, actively supported by provincial
governments. He goes on to say “And what are these structures? Treaty versus non-Treaty Indians. Status
versus non-Status Indians based on what are effectively complex calculations of
blood.”
When looking at
history and the definition of who is Aboriginal and who is not, I find it
interesting that Saul states in his book A Fair Country: Telling Truths About
Canada that Canada is a Metis civilization heavily influenced and shaped by
Aboriginal ideas, but then in The Comeback he states “Canadians who do not
think of themselves as Aboriginal will go on misleading themselves as to what
is now happening.” This leads me to think that he believes everyone is
Aboriginal or maybe I am just misunderstanding this viewpoint, because we
(First Nations) are the original peoples of this land, and it is not those who
have come and settled in what we now call Canada.
He goes onto to say
that “our standard national history portrays the turn of the nineteenth into
the twentieth century as an era of creativity and nation building,” but it was
also at the exact time, in the same country, Indigenous peoples were dying or
suffering or not reproducing because of the terrible conditions to which they
had been reduced, and doing most of this in small communities, out of the sight
and mind of the largely European Canadian population.”
Another commentary I
am uncomfortable with is the idea that Indigenous peoples have made a comeback
due to the events of 2012 and the Idle No More Movement. I believe that
everything began a lot sooner than that. There are several pivotal moments in
Aboriginal history that paved the way for us to be where we are today. You just
need to think of the example of OKA and the voices of solidarity then.
John Ralston Saul
writes a wide narrative that may seem pivotal when it comes to speaking of
citizens rights and the rebuilding of relationships that were central to the
creation of Canada, but I believe it will take a lot more work for the general
Canadian public to reach a point where they will understand First Nations
peoples and the issues at hand. It’s more than just getting the narrative
right, and it is more than just being informed and conscious. We do not see
ourselves as victims and it is not sympathy that we want. Taiaike Alfred argued
that “reconciliation can mean something if it starts from the position of
restitution. And I believe that is something to begin with.
Lastly, the whole term 'comeback' rings false because it is the Euro-Canadian opinion of First Nations people where they see us in society.
Lastly, the whole term 'comeback' rings false because it is the Euro-Canadian opinion of First Nations people where they see us in society.
The Comeback by John
Ralston Saul is published by the Peguin Group, Penguin Books Canada and is 294
pages.
No comments:
Post a Comment